This week, we found out that Ashley Biden, Joe Biden’s daughter, is the target of a Department of Justice investigation that might result in more severe punishment.
“In a letter to the judge, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of NY said that Aimee Harris had “abused justice” by continuously submitting the court with insufficient justifications, which resulted in the court having to delay her sentence hearing twelve times.”They said the actions called for a more severe punishment. The most recent postponement of Harris’s hearing was for next week. Judge Laura Swain has become increasingly stern with the defendant, threatening to issue an arrest warrant for Harris if she does not show up. Harris is awaiting her punishment for trying to sell the president’s daughter’s diary before the 2020 election.”
Naturally, the infamous journal and its contents have come up for debate once more in light of this event. As you surely recall, Ashley said in her journal that when she was younger, her father would take “definitely not suitable” showers with her.
“Oversexualized from an early age. Why is this the case? Was I abused? I believe so; I cannot recall details, but I do recall trauma. I recall not enjoying the Woolzacks’ home; I recall feeling a little sexualized by Caroline; I recall having sex with friends when I was younger; and I remember taking inappropriate showers with my dad. I remember being sensual when I shouldn’t have been.
The journal also revealed that, despite her inability to recall, she believes she may have experienced abuse.
Naturally, when it came to Biden’s diaries this week, left-wing writer Ed Krassenstein sprang to his rescue.
Naturally, Ashley Biden has since attested to the diary’s veracity and denied any manipulation, thus, Krassenstein most likely overlooked this fact. He immediately defends himself, however, by essentially stating that even if Joe Biden did take a shower with his small daughter, it was quite typical.
For apparent reasons, this was a point that many found offensive. But instead of accepting the argument, he made the absurd claim that follows:
Are there any fathers you know who take their young daughters shopping? Do you know of any pediatricians or child psychologists who have endorsed this before? I get that it is election season, but how on earth could Krassenstein possibly make this case? Is the left willing to minimize obvious predatory actions in order to support Biden? That seems to be where we are right now.
