Terrorists Target Conservatives With Bombs

An explosive device detonated early on Saturday morning outside the office of Alabama Republican AG Steve Marshall, prompting the opening of an inquiry.

In a statement on Monday, Marshall claimed that there were no injuries from the explosion and that Alabama authorities would look into the incident further. State authorities have not identified any individuals or provided any potential motivations.

“An explosive device was detonated outside of the Alabama Attorney General’s Office building in Montgomery in the early hours of Saturday, February 24,” according to a statement from Marshall. Fortunately, the explosion did not hurt any employees or workers. We are asking anyone with information to get in touch with the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency right away, as they will be spearheading the investigation.

According to reports, the explosion happened in Montgomery at the junction of South Bainbridge Street and Washington Avenue. and investigated after hearing about a suspicious package at the location.

The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency stated, “It was found that the suspicious item was an explosive device that detonated in the early morning of Saturday, Feb. 24. As the inquiry is still continuing, no more information is available.”

At around 8:19 a.m. on Saturday, Alabama Law Enforcement Agency Sgt. Jeremy Burkett reported the incident to the Alabama Bureau of Investigation. According to Burkett, the detonation did not result in any property damage.

The event follows a global spotlight on Alabama following the Supreme Court’s 8-1 ruling that three couples could file a wrongful death lawsuit against a reproductive facility for the accidental destruction of several embryos. The embryos should be acknowledged and safeguarded as unborn children, the court decided.

The Alabama Constitution’s provision stating that the state’s public policy is to protect the sanctity of unborn life served as the foundation for the judges’ ruling.

The Wrongful Death of a Minor Act’s language is vague and broad in this particular instance. Without exception, it extends to all children, born and unborn,” Justice Jay Mitchell stated in the majority ruling. “This Court has no authority to enact additional restrictions based on our subjective judgment of what constitutes or does not constitute sound public policy.”