If one believes that one’s political opponents are insane, then there is nothing wrong with labeling them as such.

The Democratic elites in the United States are a poisonous mix of insane people and pathological liars. Simply scan your surroundings. The “Free Palestine” demonstrators, as described by Athena, who resorted to using maggots to protest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, serve as a prime example of deranged behavior.

One excellent example of the previously stated deception is the persistent attempts by Democratic leaders to paint the “Free Palestine” lunatics as an extreme fringe that isn’t indicative of their views. They’re actually the Democratic base, as I stated in my most recent “Kruiser Kabana Podcast” episode.

This combination leads them to live in a surreal world that is more based in fantasy than a Harry Potter movie.

It gets me to the point. The New York Times, also known as The Official Publication of the Democratic National Committee, released a guest opinion piece by Hillary Clinton on Wednesday. The two-time presidential election loser (but she was the clear front-runner in the 2008 primary, so that counts) offers suggestions on how Kamala Harris might prevail.

Like anything Granny Maojackets puts out for public consumption, it starts with clumsy finger-pointing and an apology for her 2016 defeat, followed by the type of spin I keep telling her she finds at the bottom of a wine box.

The New York Times:

“I have some experience with how challenging it may be for strong female candidates to overcome the discrimination and unfair practices prevalent in American politics. Some have referred to me as a witch, a “nasty lady,” and worse. Even the effigy burned me. During my campaign, I would occasionally avoid discussing the importance of making history. I doubted that the electorate was prepared for it. Furthermore, I was running because I believed I was the most qualified candidate for the job—not to break down barriers. I’m glad that, despite my ongoing grief at not being able to shatter the toughest glass ceiling, having a woman at the top of the ticket seemed natural during my two presidential campaigns.”

The article’s remaining sections are pure propaganda on the supposed achievements of the Biden-Harris government.

“I’m looking forward to hearing her present a strong case against Mr. Trump, who is running on a dangerous program and failed as president the first time,” said Mrs. Clinton.

This is great news for those who were already planning to cast a Democratic ballot this year, but the concept of a “dangerous agenda” is nonexistent outside of the Coastal Media BubbleTM.

Hillary’s brief attempt at cheering falls flat when she insists that Kamala Harris can persuasively present the fanciful narrative about Biden’s successes and Dangerous Orange Man Bad. It seems that Mrs. C. has never watched a speech by Kamala Harris. For those of us who have, you are all aware that the Democrats did not gain any advantage in front-runner coherence by replacing Joe Biden with Kamala Harris. Now they’ve added an ear-splitting cackling soundtrack to go along with all the nonsensicality.

It goes without saying that Harris’s “creating history” proposals will occupy our time. The Republicans are fortunate to have a candidate who has previously handled it well.

Author: Steven Sinclaire