The federal government’s own firearms lab just admitted under oath that it cannot link the bullet pulled from Charlie Kirk’s body to the rifle they say Tyler James Robinson used to murder him. The ATF — the same agency that brought us the Waco barbecue and Fast and Furious gun-running — botched the single most important piece of forensic evidence in the assassination of one of the most prominent conservative voices in America.
Fantastic work, guys. Really inspiring confidence over there.
Defense attorneys dropped this little nugget in a court filing last week, revealing that ATF analysts “were unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson.” That’s not some technicality or legal hairsplitting. That’s the prosecution’s entire physical case blowing apart like a piñata at a birthday party — and the mainstream media treated it like a weather report from Des Moines.
We’re talking about the assassination of a 31-year-old man who was shot in the neck in front of 3,000 people at Utah Valley University while answering a question about transgender mass shooters. A conservative activist gets murdered mid-sentence while discussing politically motivated violence. The irony is so grotesque it belongs in a museum. And the feds can’t even prove the bullet came from the gun they found?
The rifle in question is a Mauser Model 98 — a German military weapon from the World War era that belonged to Robinson’s grandfather. Somebody swapped out the original 8mm barrel for a .30-06 at some point over the last seven decades. Gun experts say a barrel replacement on a rifle that old could explain why the markings don’t match, since the rifling patterns may have degraded or changed entirely.
Okay, fine. That’s a reasonable explanation. But here’s what’s not reasonable: the FBI is still conducting its own bullet comparison analysis, and it hasn’t finished yet. Neither has the lead bullet analysis. We’re more than six months out from the assassination and the two most powerful law enforcement agencies in the country still can’t produce a conclusive ballistics match. Meanwhile, they’ve dumped 620,000 files on the defense team and basically said, “Good luck sorting through all that.”
Because that strategy worked so well for the Jack Smith prosecution. (Spoiler: it didn’t.)
The texts Robinson allegedly sent to his roommate Lance Twiggs — a biological male transitioning genders whom Robinson was reportedly dating — read like a screenplay written by a first-year film student at NYU. “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” And my personal favorite: “If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence.”
Who talks like that? Steve Bannon called the texts “too stilted, too much like a script.” Candace Owens said they were “clearly doctored.” Robinson himself seemed to grasp how absurd the messages sounded when he texted Twiggs: “The f**kin messages are mostly a big meme.”
Then there are the engraved bullet casings, which read like they were designed by a committee of terminally online leftists trying to create the perfect “radicalized right-wing loner who was actually a leftist” character. One casing referenced a furry meme. Another quoted “Bella Ciao,” the Italian anti-fascist anthem. A third said “Hey, fascist, catch.” And the fourth? “If you read this, you are gay LMAO.”
We’re supposed to take this seriously as evidence of a lone-wolf political assassination and not performance art?
Now buckle up, because this is the part that really stinks. Forensic reports reveal that DNA from multiple people turned up on the rifle and related evidence. Multiple contributors. On a murder weapon. The prosecution has Robinson’s DNA on the trigger, sure — but whose DNA is the rest of it? Anderson Cooper isn’t asking. Rachel Maddow isn’t pulling that thread. Joy Reid hasn’t devoted a single hysterical segment to the mystery DNA on the gun that killed a conservative.
Funny how that works.
Imagine for one second that a prominent liberal commentator had been assassinated and the ATF admitted it couldn’t match the bullet. Maddow would be on hour 47 of continuous coverage. Democrats would’ve already convened three congressional committees, subpoenaed half the Pentagon, and greenlit a Netflix documentary crew.
But Charlie Kirk was a MAGA guy who built Turning Point USA from nothing and helped deliver millions of young voters to President Trump. So the media yawns, the ATF shrugs, and Robinson’s preliminary hearing gets kicked to May while the defense begs for a six-month delay because they’re drowning in 700 hours of unreviewed video evidence.
Robinson’s own mother told investigators her son had recently “started to lean more to the left” and become “pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” His friends said he cracked drunken jokes about Republicans “catching a bullet.” The political motive is screaming from every corner of this case — and yet nobody in the corporate press wants to connect it to the same Democrats who spent ten years calling Trump “literally Hitler,” who put crosshairs on MAGA voters, who told their base that Republicans were an existential threat to democracy itself. Maxine Waters told people to harass Republicans in restaurants. Kathy Griffin held up a severed Trump head. And then everyone acted stunned when the bullets started flying.
This is what the Democrat Party’s rhetoric produces. Dead conservatives and a media apparatus that can’t be bothered to investigate.
A young conservative leader is dead. The bullet doesn’t match the rifle. Mystery DNA sits on the weapon. The feds are six months in and still can’t close the forensic loop. If Pam Bondi’s Justice Department doesn’t rip this case open and answer every last one of these questions, then we’ve learned absolutely nothing from the last decade of political violence in this country — and Charlie Kirk died for nothing.
We owe him a hell of a lot more than that.
—
