These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

Former Trump Ally Turns Vicious In His Hate For Donald

Former Trump Ally Turns Vicious In His Hate For Donald

Former AG Bill Barr told FNC’s Martha MacCallum on Tuesday that the appointment of a “special master” to handle the sensitive materials seized at the former president’s house by a federal judge in Florida is a “mistake” and would probably be reversed on appeal.

“Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr: In any case, I concur with Andy, who this morning published a piece in the “National Review” that attempted to deconstruct the position. I believe the opinion to be incorrect. And I believe the government ought to file an appeal. It has a number of serious flaws.”

“The appointment of a special master won’t stand up, in my opinion. But even if it does, I don’t think it will significantly alter the course. In other words, I don’t think it really affects the game other than the possibility of a little rain delay.”

“However, I believe that the fundamentals of the case have been established, and that the government has very solid evidence of what it actually needs to assess whether charges are appropriate—namely, that government papers and classified material were taken and improperly handled. They are investigating because there is some evidence that suggests they were duped.”

“And none of it actually has anything to do with document content. It has to do with the presence of papers there, their classification, and the fact that subpoenas for them were issued but never fulfilled. But they don’t have to prove the content — you know, the exact counsel offered in the memo, for example — in order to succeed in this case.”

Author: Blake Ambrose

Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Most Popular

Most Popular


You Might Also Like

Migrant Army Marches To Test Trump’s Will

Migrant Army Marches To Test Trump’s Will

Just hours before President Donald Trump was sworn in for his historic second term, a caravan…
Trump To Putin: ‘Russia Is In BIG Trouble’

Trump To Putin: ‘Russia Is In BIG Trouble’

President Donald Trump wasted no time addressing one of the world’s most pressing conflicts following his inauguration, calling…
Trump Sees Red After Biden Unleashes Final, Wicked Act

Trump Sees Red After Biden Unleashes Final, Wicked Act

In one of his final acts as president, Joe Biden issued a sweeping series of preemptive pardons…
Why Trump’s Legacy Is The Greatest In American History

Why Trump’s Legacy Is The Greatest In American History

Donald J. Trump’s improbable journey from billionaire real estate mogul to the White House—twice—reaches a new historic…