These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

Former Trump Ally Turns Vicious In His Hate For Donald

Former Trump Ally Turns Vicious In His Hate For Donald

Former AG Bill Barr told FNC’s Martha MacCallum on Tuesday that the appointment of a “special master” to handle the sensitive materials seized at the former president’s house by a federal judge in Florida is a “mistake” and would probably be reversed on appeal.

“Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr: In any case, I concur with Andy, who this morning published a piece in the “National Review” that attempted to deconstruct the position. I believe the opinion to be incorrect. And I believe the government ought to file an appeal. It has a number of serious flaws.”

“The appointment of a special master won’t stand up, in my opinion. But even if it does, I don’t think it will significantly alter the course. In other words, I don’t think it really affects the game other than the possibility of a little rain delay.”

“However, I believe that the fundamentals of the case have been established, and that the government has very solid evidence of what it actually needs to assess whether charges are appropriate—namely, that government papers and classified material were taken and improperly handled. They are investigating because there is some evidence that suggests they were duped.”

“And none of it actually has anything to do with document content. It has to do with the presence of papers there, their classification, and the fact that subpoenas for them were issued but never fulfilled. But they don’t have to prove the content — you know, the exact counsel offered in the memo, for example — in order to succeed in this case.”

Author: Blake Ambrose

Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Most Popular

Most Popular


You Might Also Like

Alabama City Turns Dictatorship – Far-Left Agenda Now Forced

Alabama City Turns Dictatorship – Far-Left Agenda Now Forced

An quick ejection from a recent city council meeting in Sylacauga, Alabama, happened after some people asked about the rise…
Tim Walz Endangered Women’s Lives With This Weird Decision

Tim Walz Endangered Women’s Lives With This Weird Decision

Tim Walz, who was picked by Kamala Harris to be her vice president, is governor of Minnesota….
Post-Debate Poll: The Latest On Battleground States

Post-Debate Poll: The Latest On Battleground States

The debate moderators did a great job helping Vice President Harris on Tuesday night, but a quick poll that…
Democrats Have A New Plan To Ruin Trump’s Chances

Democrats Have A New Plan To Ruin Trump’s Chances

Have you noticed that there are more news stories about how Trump’s mental health is getting worse? “Trump doesn’t make…